Now Playing Tracks

Bible-pushing Christians open the door for Satanic activity books in Florida schools

The Satanic Temple has responded to an Orange County, Florida decision to disseminate religious materials in public school by creating complementary materials that espouse the philosophy and practice of Satanism.

Last month, a Florida judge ruled that if the Orange County school district allowed Christian groups to disseminate Bibles and Christian-oriented religious materials in its schools, it would also have to allow atheist groups to do the same.

David Williamson of the Central Florida Free Thought Community — who recently fought against Brevard County’s attempt to ban atheists from offering invocations at public meetings — sued the district over its initial unwillingness to allow atheist literature with titles like “Jesus Is Dead” and “Why I Am Not a Muslim” in the schools.

A judge dismissed that case after the school board decided to allow the materials.

The Satanic Temple took advantage of this decision, deciding to flood Orange County schools with a pamphlet entitled The Satanic Children’s Big Book of Activities that contains kid-friendly Satanic lessons.

“These bullies are mad and afraid of things they don’t understand,” the instructions on the word-jumble reads. “Help Damian use inclusive language to defuse the situation.

The spokesman for the Satanic Temple, Lucien Greaves, explained that his organization “would never seek to establish a precedent of disseminating our religious materials in public schools because we believe our constitutional values are better served by respecting a strong separation of Church and State.”

“However,” he continued, “if a public school board is going to allow religious pamphlets and full Bibles to be distributed to students — as is the case in Orange County, Florida — we think the responsible thing to do is to ensure that these students are given access to a variety of differing religious opinions, as opposed to standing idly by while one religious voice dominates the discourse and delivers propaganda to youth.”

The Satanic Temple made headlines earlier this year when it successfully petitioned the state of Oklahoma to allow it to erect a goat-headed Baphomet statue adjacent to a display of the Ten Commandments.

Greaves made it clear that, in both cases, his organization is only responding to provocations by the Christian community.

““Even as we prefer public policies respecting secularism, we feel that opportunities — such as this — to establish an equal voice for contrasting religious opinions in the public square, tend to favor marginalized, lesser-known, and alternative religions,” he said.

“I am quite certain that all of the children in these Florida schools are already aware of the Christian religion and it’s Bible, and this might be the first exposure these children have to the actual practice of Satanism. We think many students will be very curious to see what we offer.”

download the Satanic Big Book of Children’s Fun here

Reblog if you have read fan fiction better than some published books


Help me prove a point

You were forced to read some of it in school too:

  • The Aenid- Virgil- Odyssey/Iliad fanfic
  • The Inferno-  Dante hangs out with Virgil. it’s a fanfic convention!
  • Grendal- Gardner
  • Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead
  • Just about everything you had to read that was stated as being a “retelling of such and such myth”








We just bought a LOT of books.

I would buy them all.

Sorry, they’re already ours. :-P

Holy shit.

One single day’s purchase.

We finally got them all out of the car, at least. That took a LONG time.


Uncle Walter said “tell them we’re Literary Doomsday Preppers.”

And I’m, like, “And what, we just decided that ROMANCE NOVELS were the only books worth saving??”

He responded “I never said we were GOOD at it.”

This is not a cover image


It really should not be difficult to produce an aesthetically competent cover when publishing a book on Foucault. With his polished dome, polo neck and intense yet playful gaze, Foucault was born to be the poster boy for his own cult following far more than Deleuze, Nietzsche or Kant. And if a photo is not forthcoming then there are plenty of other appropriate ways to represent his thought visually - surely? 

So why then are the so many appalling covers? Today’s blog is a celebration of just a few:


A personal favourite - it is as if someone vomited rainbow spaghetti all over the worst photo of Foucault ever taken.


This doesn’t even look like Foucault. And his hands seem too small.


I don’t think Foucault’s thought bubbles would be yellow.


Why do these illustrated guides have the worst covers given their focus on, er, graphics. Overdesigning or something.


It’s actually quite sweet that someone actually went and tried to draw Foucault’s face in the sand…or sad.


False advertising. This makes the debate look like some kind of love-in.




Severe, unforgiving title font. Horrible green cover. Pointless graphic.


Foucault as mise-en-abime.


There is no greater violence than the atrocity of this cover.


Aaaaaargh. No.


Can Routledge not afford to pay graphic designers?


I find this quite scary.


Adventures in photoshop


To what extent is squashing your face against some glass really an act of self-transformation?


Line drawing Foucault looks bored and he only has to be on the cover.

We make Tumblr themes